LME 5: Gulf of Mexico Large Marine Ecosystem
Listed below is background material on the Gulf of Mexico Large Marine
Ecosystem. To keep this site up-to-date, users are requested to provide
relevant information or links to the LME webmaster .
For this GEF Project, a Transboundary
Diagnostic Analysis and Strategic Action Program is being developed.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION:
This LME is characterized by its tropical climate. The Gulf of Mexico is
partially isolated from the Atlantic Ocean. Important hypotheses concerned
with the growing impacts of pollution, overexploitation, and environmental
changes on sustained biomass yields are under investigation for this LME.
Intensive fishing is the primary force driving the LME, with climate as the
secondary driving force. LME books and articles pertaining to this LME include
Richards and McGowan, 1989, Dagg et al., 1991, Brown et al., 1991, Kumpf,
Steidinger and Sherman, 1999, and Schipp, 1999. The Global Environment Facility
(GEF) is supporting an LME project in the Gulf of Mexico to address critical
threats to the coastal and marine environment, and to promote ecosystem-based
management of coastal and marine resources. For an introduction to
the Gulf of Mexico Large Marine Ecosystem, review the Gulf of Mexico Program
, sponsored by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
I. PRODUCTIVITY:
The continental shelf is topographically diverse, and includes slopes,
escarpments, knolls, basins and submarine canyons (for more information on
the physical oceanography of the Gulf of Mexico, see Wiseman et al, 1999).
Ocean waters enter from the Yucatan channel and exit from the straits of Florida,
creating the loop current which is associated with the upwelling and the
high level of nutrients flow of this LME (for more information on what controls
primary production in this LME, see Lohrenz et al, 1999). There is an additional
major fresh water source, from rivers in the USA and from Mexico. Productivity
ranges from eutrophic conditions in coastal waters to oligotrophic in the
deeper ocean. Overall, The Gulf of Mexico Large Marine Ecosystem is considered
a Class II, moderately productive (150-300 gC/m2-yr), ecosystem based on
SeaWiFS global primary productivity estimates. The productivity of the LME
is complex. Lohrenz et al, 1999 distinguish between local scale, mesoscale,
and synoptic scale processes.
Local scale processes include small river and estuarine flow, wave effects
and near shore circulation. Mesoscale processes include tides, upwelling,
meteorological forcing, topographic effects, large river flow, and Loop Current
circulation features. Synoptic scale processes include seasonal variations
in solar and atmospheric conditions, and Loop Current excursions. The region
of the Mississippi River outflow has the highest measured rates of primary
production in the Gulf of Mexico LME (see Sklar and Turner 1981; Lohrenz et
al., 1990). Hurricanes may increase phytoplankton biomass and primary production
because they increase the vertical advection of nutrients into surface waters
(see Iverson, 1977).
II. FISH AND FISHERIES:
The NOAA/NMFS Southeast Region includes statistics for both this
LME and the Southeast US Continental Shelf LME (see Our Living Oceans, 1999,
and the NMFS Southeast Fisheries Science
Center. For landings of mackerel, variations in reef fish landings,
shrimp, blue crab and menhaden, specific to the US Gulf of Mexico, see Our
Living Oceans, 1999. Reef fish include groupers, snappers, amberjacks and
triggerfish. Red grouper is the most important commercial species of reef
fish off the west Florida coast. Red snapper is apparently the most overfished
species in the Gulf of Mexico (Goodyear, 1996). Shrimp fisheries use small
mesh nets, with a resulting bycatch of non-target and/or under-size red snappers,
croakers, sea trouts and sea turtles. Sea turtles are listed as endangered
or threatened under the Endangered Species Act. For fishery management plans
in the US Gulf of Mexico, see Our Living Oceans, Appendix 2. The management
of king mackerel has been successful in increasing the fish biomass, but the
goal of recovering the stock has not yet been accomplished. There is a Gulf
of Mexico fishery management council for this LME (see the Gulf of Mexico Fisheries Management
Council). The Gulf of Mexico LME is bordered by 3 countries: the
USA, Cuba, and Mexico. The FAO 10 year trend
(click on figure below) shows a predominance of herrings, sardines, anchovies,
representing almost 60% of the LME catch percentage (see FAO 2003). The catch
was 900,000 tons in 1990, and up to 1 million in 1999, with a low in 1992
and a peak in 1994. See also detailed fish catch
statistics available for this LME, made available by the University
of British Columbia Fisheries Center. For a status of exploited fish species
in the Gulf of Mexico, see Shipp, 1999. The long term harvesting effects on
coral reefs are not well understood and will require cautious management.
The removal of apex predators from coral reefs may result in shifts in species
composition. For information on fisheries management in Mexico, see Arreguin-Sanchez
et al, 1999. .
III. POLLUTION and ECOSYSTEM HEALTH :
The Gulf of Mexico LME shows signs of ecosystem stress, in bays, estuaries,
and coastal regions (see Birkett and Rapport, 1999). There is shoreline alteration,
pollutant discharge, oil and gas development, and nutrient loading. The overall
condition for the USA section of this LME, according to the EPA’s 7 primary
indicators is: good dissolved oxygen; fair water quality; poor coastal wetlands,
poor eutrophic condition, poor sediment, benthos and fish tissue. (EPA, 2001
has maps and figures for the US Gulf Coast). Coastal wetland loss is currently
about 5% per decade. Fish condition is poor, with several consumption advisories
for this LME. There have been incidents of mercury contamination of fishery
resources. For an assessment of ecologic stresses and information about ecosystem
health, see Kumpf, Steidinger and Sherman, 1999. Large hypoxic areas have
been detected in this LME (see Rabalais et al, 1999). The Mississippi-Atchafalaya
River Basin and Gulf of Mexico hypoxic zone is the largest zone of anthropogenic
coastal hypoxia in the western hemisphere. It occurs where the Gulf of Mexico
waters receive the flow of the Mississippi-Atchafalaya River basin. Hypoxia
occurs below the fresh-water driven pycnocline from late February
through early October, but it is most widespread, continuous, and severe
in June, July, and August. (Rabalais, 1999). The nutrients delivered
from the watershed foster large-scale phytoplankton production (see report
of the National
Science and Technology Council Committee on environment and natural resources).
See also the “Action Plan for reducing,
mitigating, and controlling hypoxia in the Northern Gulf of Mexico”, by
the Mississippi River/Gulf of Mexico watershed nutrient task force.
A goal is to reduce the area to less than 1,930 miles by the year 2015.All
partners will implement actions aimed at achieving a 30% reduction in nitrogen
discharges to the Gulf. Wetlands will be created and restored. Other goals
are to increase the efficiency of agricultural and urban non point source
nutrient management practices, and upgrade sewage treatment facilities for
nitrogen removal. For oil pollution, see Gold-Bouchot et al, 1999. The
Council for Agricultural
Science and Technology (CAST) has produced a report for this LME.
IV. SOCIOECONOMIC CONDITIONS:
The Gulf of Mexico LME is a major asset to the three surrounding countries,
in terms of fisheries, tourism, agriculture, oil, infrastructure, trade and
shipping (see Cato and Adams, 1999). Commercial fishing is an important component
of the LME’s economy. It contributed $630 million to the USA in 1993.
The US Gulf region contains one-fourth of the U.S. seafood processing and
wholesale establishments. Marine sport-fishing is another industry of regional
importance, providing jobs and recreational activities. Species of economic
importance in the Mexican part of the Gulf of Mexico LME include brown shrimp,
white shrimp, pink shrimp, octopus, red grouper, and the brackish water clam.
Octopus is currently being exploited by an artisanal fleet, and by a middle-sized
fleet (see Solis et al., 1995). In the USA, the infrastructure for oil and
gas production in the Gulf of Mexico (oil refineries, petrochemical and gas
processing plants, supply and service bases for offshore oil and gas production
units, platform construction yards and pipeline yards) is concentrated in
coastal Louisiana and eastern Texas. Oil production has an impact on other
environmental and economic resources. The Gulf of Mexico LME contains major
shipping lanes. Port facilities contribute to important sources of employment.
The volume and value of shipping has increased in the Gulf region (see Cato
and Adams, 1999). Population along the US coast increased by 52% between 1970
and 1990, and is currently around 4 million people. For the socioeconomic
effects of hypoxic conditions in the Gulf of Mexico, see the Gulf of Mexico
Hypoxia Assessment Report.
V. GOVERNANCE:
A project proposal has been developed for this LME by marine resource
experts from Mexico, Cuba and the United States. The result will be a Transboundary
Diagnostic Analysis and Strategic Action Programme. Its objective is to enhance
national and regional efforts to address top priority environmental and living
resource issues in the LME. A new approach is needed in order to conserve
the living resources and habitats of this LME, as well as protect it from
pollution. Legal, policy and institutional reforms will be developed to address
the major threats to ecosystem sustainability. There is no current institutional
arrangement for cooperation between the 3 countries. In 1998, the US Congress
passed the Harmful Algal Bloom and Hypoxia Research and Control Act, which
contained specific requirements for addressing hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico
(see under Ecosystem Health). For more information on management and governance,
see Kumpf, Steidinger and Sherman, 1999. See the Florida Department of Environmental
Protection (DEP) initiative in ecosystem management. The
EPA's National Estuary Program
(NEP) supports six projects along the Gulf of Mexico. View the National
Coastal Condition Report for more information. The National Marine Fisheries Service
(NMFS) Southeast Regional office provides technical and administrative
support to the Gulf of Mexico Fishery
Management Council (Gulf Council) , one of eight established by
the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act. The
Gulf Council prepares fishery management plans for species in the US waters
of the Gulf of Mexico.
REFERENCES:
Articles and LME volumes:
Arreguín-Sánchez et al. "Stock-Recruitment Relationships (SRRS):
A Scientific Challenge to Support
Fisheries Management in the Campeche Bank, Mexico", in H. Kumpf, et al.,
(eds.) The Gulf of Mexico Large Marine Ecosystem: Assessment, Sustainability,
and Management (Blackwell Science, Inc., 1999).
Birkett, S.H. and D.J. Rapport, 1999. A Stress-Response Assessment of the
Northwestern Gulf of Mexico
Ecosystem. In: H. Kumpf, et al., (eds.) The Gulf of Mexico Large Marine Ecosystem:
Assessment, Sustainability, and Management (Blackwell Science, Inc.).
Bradford E. Brown, Joan Browder, J. Powers and Carole Goodyear, 1991. Biomass,
yield models and
management strategies for the Gulf of Mexico ecosystem. In: Large Marine
Ecosystems, vol. 4, food chains, yields, models, and management of Large
Marine Ecosystems, ed. By K Sherman, L.M. Alexander and B.D Gold.
J. Cato and C.M. Adams, 1999. Economic significance of the Gulf of Mexico
related to population,
income, employment, minerals, fisheries and shipping. In: In: H.Kumpf, K.
Steidinger, K. Sherman (editors), 1999. The Gulf of Mexico Large Marine Ecosystem:
assessment, sustainability, and management. Blackwell Science, 736 pages.
Dagg, M., C. Grimes, S. Lohrenz, B. Mckee, R. Twilley and W. Wiseman, 1991.
Continental shelf food
chains of the northern gulf of Mexico. In K. Sherman, L.M. Alexander and
B.D Gold (eds.), Food Chains, Yields, Models, and Management of Large Marine
Ecosystems. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, Volume 4, pp. 67-106.
EPA, 2001. National Coastal Condition Report.
FAO, 2003. Trends in oceanic captures and clustering of large marine ecosystems—2
studies based on the
FAO capture database. FAO fisheries technical paper 435. 71 pages.
G. Gold-Bouchot, O. Zapata-Perez, E. Norena-Barroso, M. Herrera-Rodriguez,
V. Ceja-Moreno, and M.
Zavala-Coral, 1999. Oil Pollution in the Southern Gulf of Mexico. In: H.Kumpf,
K. Steidinger, K. Sherman (editors), 1999. The Gulf of Mexico Large Marine
Ecosystem: assessment, sustainability, and management. Blackwell Science,
736 pages.
H.Kumpf, K. Steidinger, K. Sherman (editors), 1999. The Gulf of Mexico Large
Marine Ecosystem:
assessment, sustainability, and management. Blackwell Science, 736 pages.
S.E. Lohrenz, D.A. Wiesenburg, R.A. Arnone and X Chen, 1999. What controls
primary production in the
Gulf of Mexico? In: H.Kumpf, K. Steidinger, K. Sherman (editors), 1999. The
Gulf of Mexico Large Marine Ecosystem: assessment, sustainability, and management.
Blackwell Science, 736 pages.
Our living oceans—report on the status of U.S. Living Marine Resources, 1999.
NOAA. 301 pages.
Rabalais, N., R. turner and W. Wiseman, 1991. Hypoxia in the Northern Gulf
of Mexico. Linkages with the
Mississippi River. In: H.Kumpf, K. Steidinger, K. Sherman (editors), 1999.
The Gulf of Mexico Large Marine Ecosystem: assessment, sustainability, and
management. Blackwell Science, 736 pages.
William Richards and Michael F. McGowan, 1989. Biological productivity in
the Gulf of Mexico:
identifying the causes of variability. In: Biomass Yields and geography of
Large Marine Ecosystems, K Sherman and L.M. Alexander, 1989.
R. Schipp, 1999. Status of exploited fish species in the Gulf of Mexico.
In: H.Kumpf, K. Steidinger, K.
Sherman (editors), The Gulf of Mexico Large Marine Ecosystem: assessment,
sustainability, and management. Blackwell Science, 736 pages.
W.J. Wiseman, and W. Sturges, 1999. Physical oceanography of the Gulf of
Mexico: Processes that
regulate its biology. In: H.Kumpf, K. Steidinger, K. Sherman (editors), 1999.
The Gulf of Mexico Large Marine Ecosystem: assessment, sustainability, and
management. Blackwell Science, 736 pages.
Other references:
Arreguín-Sánchez, F. et al. 1995. "State of the Population
Dynamics and Stock Assessment of the Red
Grouper (Epinephelus morio) Fishery from the Campeche Bank, Mexico", in Biology
of Tropical Groupers and Snappers.
Arreguin-Sanchez, F. Munro, J. L. and Pauly, D. eds. ICLARM Conf. Proc. 48
.
Arreguín-Sánchez, F. et al. 1995. "Las Pesquerias de Camaron
de Altamar: Explotacion, Dinamica y
Evaluacion", in Analisis y Diagnostico de los Recursos Pesqueros Criticos
del Golfo de Mexico. Flores-Hernandez, D.; Sanchez-Gil, P.; Seijo, J. C.
and Arreguin-Sanchez, F. eds. Univ. Auton. Campeche. EPOMEX Serie Cientifica
7 .
Biggs, D.C. and Muller-Karger, F.E. 1994. "Ship and satellite Observations
of Chlorophyll Stocks in
Interacting Cyclone-anticyclone pairs in the Western Gulf of Mexico". Journal
of Geophysical Resources. 99:7371-7384.
Britton, J.C. and Morton, B. 1989. Shore Ecology of the Gulf of Mexico. University
of Texas Press,
Austin Texas.
Browder, J. A. et al. 1991. "Multi-Species Fisheries in the Gulf of Mexico".
1989 Annual Meeting of
International council for the Exploration of the Sea. ICES Marine Science
Symposium. 193: 194-197.
Bryant, WR AA Meyerhoff, NK Brown Jr., MA Furrer, TE Pyle, and JW Antoine.
1969. Escarpments, reef
trends, and diapiric structures, eastern Gulf of Mexico. American Association
of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin. 53:2506-2542.
Clarke, A.J, ed. 1995. Northeastern Gulf of Mexico Physical Oceanography
Workshop: Proceedings of
a workshop held in Tallahassee, Florida, April 5-7, 1994. U.S. Department
of the Interior, Minerals Management Service, Gulf of Mexico OCS Region,
257 pp.
Cochrane, J.D. 1962. "The Cool Surface Water and Front on the Western Flank
of the Yucatan Current".
Journal of Geophysical Resources. 67:1632.
Conner, W.H., et al. 1989. Influence of hurricanes on coastal ecosystems
along the northern Gulf of
Mexico. Wetlands Ecol. Manage. 1:45-56.
Cummings-Parrack, N. 1993. "The Exploitation Status of the Atlantic Amberjack
Fisheries Through 1991".
NMFS, Miami Laboratory contribution No. MIA-92/93-30.
Darnell, R.M. and Defenbaught, R.E. 1990. Gulf of Mexico: Environmental overview
and history of
environmental research. Amer. Zool. 30:3-6.
Dowgiallo, M.J. (ed.). 1994. Coastal Oceanographic Effects of Summer 1993
Mississippi River Flooding.
Special NOAA Report, NOAA Coastal Ocean Office/National Weather Service,
Silver Spring, Maryland.
Escobar, E. and Castaneda, O. 1995. "Infauna del Margen Continental de Yucatan
y Tamaulipas". Reporte
de la campana oceanografica OGMX 11. Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnologia,
Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico.
Giattina, James and Diane T. Altsman. 1998. The Gulf of Mexico Program: A
Partnership with a Purpose.
EPA, Gulf of Mexico Program. EPA, Gulf of Mexico Program, Stennis Space Center,
MS
Gold-Bouchot, G. et al. 1995. Hydrocarbon Concentrations in the American
Oyster (Crassostrea
virginica) in Laguna de Terminos, Campeche, Mexico. Bulletin of Environmental
Contamination and Toxicology 53(2):222-227.
Gold-Bouchot, G. et al. 1995. Histopathological Effects of Petroleum Hydrocarbons
and Heavy Metals on
the American Oyster, Crassostrea virginica , from Tabasco, Mexico. Marine
Pollution Bulletin 31(4-12):439-445.
Goodyear, C. P. 1989. "Status of the Red Drum Stocks of the gulf of Mexico
Report for 1989". NOAA,
National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Fisheries Center, Miami Laboratory,
Coastal Resources Division, Miami, FL. Contribution CRD 88/89-14.
Goodyear, C. P. and Schirripa, M. J. 1993. "The Red Grouper Fishery of the
Gulf of Mexico". NMFS,
Miami Laboratory Contribution No. MIA-92/93-75.
Goodyear, C. P. 1996. "Status of the Red Drum Stocks of the Gulf of Mexico".
NMFS, Miami Laboratory
Contribution No. MIA-95/96-47.
Gracia, A. 1995. "Impacto de la Pesca Artesanal Sobre la Produccion del Camaron
Rosa do Penaeus
Farfantepenaeus duorarum Burkenroad, 1939". Ciencias Marinas. 21 (3): 343-359.
Gracia, A. 1996. "White Shrimp Recruitment Overfishing". Mar. freshwater
Res. 47: 59-65.
Kelly FJ. 1991. Physical Oceanography. In Brooks JM and CP Giammona, eds.
Mississippi-Alabama
Continental Shelf Ecosystem Study Data Summary and Synthesis. US Dept. of
the Interior, Minerals Management Service, Gulf of Mexico OCS Region.
Kennicutt, M.C., et al. 1988. Organic compounds of environmental concern
in the Gulf of Mexico: A
review. Aquatic Toxicology 11:191-212.
Lohrenz, S.E.; Dagg, M.J. and Whitledge, T.E. 1990. "Enhanced Primary Production
at the Plume/Oceanic
Interface of the Mississippi River". Continental Shelf Resources. 10:639-664.
Lohrenz, S.E.; Redalje, D.G. and Fahnenstiel, G.L. 1995. "Optical Properties
of Mississippi River Plume
and Adjacent Shelf Waters During March 1991". In NOAA Coastal Ocean Program,
Nutrient Enhanced Coastal Ocean Productivity, proceedings of a Workshop,
Texas-Louisiana Sea Grant Publications. 67-74.
McClellan, D. B. and Cummings, N. J. 1996. "Stock Assessment of Gulf of Mexico
Greater Amberjack
Through 1995". NMFS, Miami Laboratory Contribution No. MIA-96/97-03.
Mississippi River/Gulf of Mexico watershed nutrient task force, 2001. Action
Plan for reducing, mitigating,
and controlling hypoxia in the Northern gulf of Mexico.
Morris, A.W.; Allen, J.I.; Howland, R.J.M. and Wood, R.G. 1995. "The Estuary
Plume Zone: Source or
Sink for Land-Derived Nutrient Discharges?" Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 40:387.
Muller-Karger, F.E.; Walsh, J.J.; Evans, R.H. and Meyers, M.B. 1991. "On
the Seasonal Phytoplankton
Concentration and Sea Surface Temperature Cycles of the Gulf of Mexico as
Determined by Satellites". Journal of Geophysical Resources. 96:12645-12665.
Palmer, S.J. and Presley, B.J. 1993. Mercury bioaccumulation by shrimp (Penaeus
aztecus) transplanted to
Lavaca Bay, Texas. Marine Poll.Bull . 26:564-566.
Rabalais, N.N.1992. An Updated Summary of Status and Trends in Indicators
of Nutrient Enrichment in
the Gulf of Mexico. Report to the Gulf of Mexico Program, Nutrient Enrichment
Subcommittee. Publ. No. EPA/800-R-92-004, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Office of Water, Gulf of Mexico Program Office, Stennis Space Center, Mississippi,
421 pp.
Rabalais, N. N. and Boesch, D. F. 1987. "Dominant Features and Processes
of Continental Shelf
Environments of the United States". In Long-Term Environmental Effects of
Offshore Oil and Gas Development. Boesch, D. F. and Rabalais, N. N., eds.
Elsevier Applied Science, London, 71-147.
Rabalais, N. N. et al. 1995. "Effects of Bottom Water Hypoxia on Benthic
Communities of the
Southeastern Louisiana Continental Shelf". OCS Study/MMS 94-0054. U. S. Department
of the Interior, Minerals Management Service, Gulf of Mexico OCS Region,
New Orleans, Louisiana.
Rabalais, N.N., et al.1996. Nutrient changes in the Mississippi River and
the system responseson the
adjacent continental shelf. Estuaries 19(2B):386-407.
Roberts, HH, RA McBride and JM Coleman. 1998. Outer Shelf and Slope Geology
of the Gulf of Mexico:
An Overview.
Sahl, L.E.; Merrell, W.J. and Biggs, D.C. 1993. "The Influence of Advection
on the Spatial Variability of
Nutrient Concentrations on the Texas-Louisiana continental Shelf". Continental
Shelf Resources. 13:233-251.
Salvador, A. 1991. The Gulf of Mexico Basin: Geological Society of America
- The Geology of North
America (DNAG), Volume J, Boulder, CO, 568 pp.
Sanders, N. J. Jr. et al. 1990. "SEAMAP Environmental and Biological Atlas
of the Gulf of Mexico, 1986".
Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission Publication No. 20. Ocean Springs,
MS.
Sericano, J.L., et al. 1993. National Status and Trends Mussel Watch Program:
Chlordane-related
compounds in Gulf of Mexico oysters, 1986-90. Environ. Pollut. 82:23-32.
Shiller, A.M. and Boyle, E.A. 1987. Variability of dissolved trace metals
in the Mississippi River.
Geochim Cosmochim. Acta 51:3273-3277.
Sklar, F.H. and Turner, R.E. 1981. "Characteristics of Phytoplankton Production
off Barataria Bay in an
Area Influenced by the Mississippi River". Contributions in Marine Science.
24:93-106.
Solis et al. 1995. "Pesquerias de Cefalopodos del Golfo de Mexico", in Analisis
y Diagnostico de los
Recursos Pesqueros Criticos del Golfo de Mexico. Flores-Hernandez, D. Sanchez-Gil,
P. Seijo, J. C. and Arreguin-Sanchez, F. eds. Univ. Auton. Campeche. EPOMEX
Serie Cientifica 7.
Stanley, D.R. and Wilson, C.A. 1990. A fishery-dependent based study of fish
species composition and
associated catch rates around oil and gas structures off Louisiana. Fish.
Bull. 88:719-730.
Turner, R.E. 1990. Landscape development and coastal wetland losses in the
northern Gulf of Mexico.
Amer. Zool. 30:89-105.
Turner, R.E. and Rabalais, N.N. 1991. Changes in the Mississippi River water
quality this century.
Implications for coastal food webs. BioScience 41(3):140-147.
Wade, T.L., et al. 1988. NOAA Gulf of Mexico Status and Trends Program: Trace
organic contaminant
distribution in sediments and oysters. Estuaries 11:171-179.
Walker, N.D. and Rouse, L.J. 1993. "Satellite Assessment of Mississippi River
Discharge Plume
Variability". OCS Study MMS 93-0044, U.S. Department of the Interior, Mineral
Management Service, Gulf of Mexico OCS Regional Office, New Orleans, LA.
50 pp.
Walsh J.J., Dieterle, MB Meyers and FE Muller-Karger. 1989. Nitrogen exchange
at the continental
margin: a numerical study of the Gulf of Mexico. Prog. Oceanogr. 23:245-301.
Wiseman, Jr., WJ and Wilton Sturges. 1998. Physical Oceanography of the Gulf
of Mexico: Some
Processes that Regulate its Biology.
Wiseman, Jr., WJ, et al. 1997. Seasonal and interannual variability within
the Louisiana Coastal Current:
Stratification and hypoxia. J. Mar. Systems 12:237-248.
Worzel J.L. and C.A. Burke. 1979. The margins of the Gulf of Mexico. In JS
Watkins, L Montadert and
PW Dickerson, eds. Geological and geophysical investigations of continental
margins. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Memoir 29.
modified 24 September 2003